<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compete Better, Use Your Competitors’ Products</title>
	<link>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212</link>
	<description>Explore trends in enterprise marketing including product, channel, lead generation and interactive strategy. By Crimson Consulting Group.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kern Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2832</link>
		<author>Kern Lewis</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2832</guid>
		<description>Using other people's products applies across the board. Many banks for whom I have worked have their senior executives book home and other loans with competitors and use competitive depository products to keep plugged into the competition. In the case of the loans, there are also regulatory requirements to be met, which turns a necessary step into a positive one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using other people&#8217;s products applies across the board. Many banks for whom I have worked have their senior executives book home and other loans with competitors and use competitive depository products to keep plugged into the competition. In the case of the loans, there are also regulatory requirements to be met, which turns a necessary step into a positive one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marius Ciortea</title>
		<link>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2031</link>
		<author>Marius Ciortea</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>How do you tell your customers that you are using products, which you are telling them not to buy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you tell your customers that you are using products, which you are telling them not to buy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil S Chiplunkar</title>
		<link>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2028</link>
		<author>Sunil S Chiplunkar</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>Absolutely right. Tunnel vision is the Achilles heel of marketers. Companies are so obsessed with their market offerings that competitor blips on the radar are not given due attention. Furthermore, it is not politically right in companies to procure competitor products and discuss about them...egos get hurt, and that could be dangerous to an individual. So why take the risk? Yes Sir is the best approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely right. Tunnel vision is the Achilles heel of marketers. Companies are so obsessed with their market offerings that competitor blips on the radar are not given due attention. Furthermore, it is not politically right in companies to procure competitor products and discuss about them&#8230;egos get hurt, and that could be dangerous to an individual. So why take the risk? Yes Sir is the best approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Gow</title>
		<link>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2027</link>
		<author>Glenn Gow</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>Al, great point.

I am NOT saying that you should violate any patent or confidentiality agreement. 

Let's take the Apple - Nokia example. Apple employees buy Nokia phones and USE them! I'm not saying they tear them apart to see what what technologies are found inside. I'm saying they discover why Nokia sells BILLIONS of phones vs. Apple's MILLIONS of phones.

Wow. What an experience that could be. What if they actually LIKE something about the Nokia phone. Then, they will be thinking about how to make the next iphone better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al, great point.</p>
<p>I am NOT saying that you should violate any patent or confidentiality agreement. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take the Apple - Nokia example. Apple employees buy Nokia phones and USE them! I&#8217;m not saying they tear them apart to see what what technologies are found inside. I&#8217;m saying they discover why Nokia sells BILLIONS of phones vs. Apple&#8217;s MILLIONS of phones.</p>
<p>Wow. What an experience that could be. What if they actually LIKE something about the Nokia phone. Then, they will be thinking about how to make the next iphone better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al sargent</title>
		<link>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2026</link>
		<author>al sargent</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2026</guid>
		<description>You have a point about knowing how your competitor's products work, and knowing how they compare to your offerings. 

However, how does one avoid charges of reverse engineering by your competitors? Where is the line between ethical and legal competitive research, and illegal reverse engineering?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a point about knowing how your competitor&#8217;s products work, and knowing how they compare to your offerings. </p>
<p>However, how does one avoid charges of reverse engineering by your competitors? Where is the line between ethical and legal competitive research, and illegal reverse engineering?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Caddell</title>
		<link>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2024</link>
		<author>John Caddell</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=212#comment-2024</guid>
		<description>Glenn, thanks for a thought-provoking post. It's always been seen as loyal to love and use your own products (years ago as a GTE employee I was very impressed to see a presentation from the Sylvania light bulb group in which the climax was them stomping a GE bulb on stage).

But you bring up a very good point. In today's ultra-competitive environment, a company must understand both the strengths and weaknesses of its own products and those of its competitors. How better to learn that than by using the products and gaining expertise in them?

To me, it's an extension of valuing dissent. Companies must get past the loyalty question and encourage the use of competitive products to build a 3-dimensional picture of itself in the marketplace. 

Until then, customers will continue to make puzzling choices, selecting what seems to be an inferior competitor as compared to "our" market-leading product.

Regards, John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, thanks for a thought-provoking post. It&#8217;s always been seen as loyal to love and use your own products (years ago as a GTE employee I was very impressed to see a presentation from the Sylvania light bulb group in which the climax was them stomping a GE bulb on stage).</p>
<p>But you bring up a very good point. In today&#8217;s ultra-competitive environment, a company must understand both the strengths and weaknesses of its own products and those of its competitors. How better to learn that than by using the products and gaining expertise in them?</p>
<p>To me, it&#8217;s an extension of valuing dissent. Companies must get past the loyalty question and encourage the use of competitive products to build a 3-dimensional picture of itself in the marketplace. </p>
<p>Until then, customers will continue to make puzzling choices, selecting what seems to be an inferior competitor as compared to &#8220;our&#8221; market-leading product.</p>
<p>Regards, John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
