Blogroll    |    Favorite Sites    |    Books we Read    |    Visit crimson-consulting.com

Did IT kill the loyalty program?
Posted by General on 10/09/07 under Interactive

Last week for my visit to Online Market World I tried to book a car, choosing my favorite rental agency (one of the major players). I was dismayed to learn that my club membership number was no longer recognized. I suppose it had been two years since my last rental in the States–most of my travel for the past two years has been in Europe, where I use a different agency.

Now, I’ve had that membership number since 1993, and it’s recorded in all my travel profiles (Orbitz, Travelocity, etc.). Along with my number, the car company maintains all my personal preferences, my address, my credit card number–everything that makes it convenient for me to use them over another agency, even if they’re not the cheapest.

That’s the point of a loyalty program; in a sense it’s a compact between two parties. The customer agrees to submit their personal information to the vendor, and the vendor in turn provides additional services to that customer. Any marketing and sales professional will tell you that loyalty programs and customer relationship management are key to retaining customers and increasing market share.

So why was my customer number and personal profile deleted? The message is clear; they must not value me as a customer.  I should go somewhere else.

Of course it’s not that simple. I do consulting is an area where marketing meets IT, so I can guess what really happened. I know that if the sales or marketing manager were questioned about the need for obsoleting such data, they would say “Don’t ever do it! Disk space is cheap, and our customers, even occasional customers, are important to us.”

But some well-meaning person in IT decided that they needed to “clean out” old records from their customer care system, so they instituted a policy of cleaning out idle records every two years. It may even reduce the task of backing up data, and increase the speed of lookups within their online systems. There was probably a good reason for it.

The real question is, who should be making these decisions about customer relationship data? The answer is that Sales and Marketing should work with IT not just to define marketing programs and get them online, but to think about the ongoing maintenance and IT policies, and how they might affect the company’s bottom line.

Loyalty programs shouldn’t have the effect, as this one did, of disenfranchising customers and turning them away if they haven’t made a purchase in a while. That’s like saying “if you don’t do regular business with us then we don’t want your business.” That’s a Disloyalty program!

Sales and marketing program managers aren’t IT specialists; IT professionals aren’t marketers. That’s why any such sales and marketing program needs open communication between the two groups, especially a discussion of the ramifications of IT policies and procedures and how they will effect the customer experience.

It may come down to hiring a specialist who has experience brokering between IT and marketing–an information architecture or a user experience professional who can “see around corners” and detect issues and the gaps between marketing’s program plan and IT’s subsequent deployment. The investment in good advice is small when compared to the alternative : losing customers.


Trackback

http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/wp-trackback.php?p=174
Subscribe to this topic Comment Rss or TrackBack
Ron Shevlin said on October 10th, 2007 - IP:159.127.66.112

Same thing happened to me, but w/ an airline, not a car rental agency. The reason the airline gave was that it restructured the ID numbers of their loyalty program. Problem is, the new number they sent me probably went to a company I hadn’t worked at in years.

The big failure here isn’t w/ IT. It’s with the intersection between IT and the business (in this case, marketing).

Couldn’t ANYONE at these firms have had the foresight to see this coming? And train customer service reps on how to respond? And create an easy-to-use mechanism for them to match your old number to the new number (assuming there was one, and if not, to immediately create a new one for you)?

Rich Julius said on October 19th, 2007 - IP:24.211.220.116

Hi Ron,

I agree completely–the problem is NOT with IT (but it did make for a catchy title). The issue is that IT and Marketing are islands, and we need bridges to connect them. I call these bridges “consultants.” ;-)

Seriously, the the issue is that IT and Marketing don’t always know that they need to coordinate on these things. (That’s the problem with islands.)

BTW, I’ve really enjoyed reading your blog.

Matt Lambert said on November 9th, 2007 - IP:212.159.67.85

It’s time for a new department.

Communications always used to have a dual meaning, pointed both to technology and towards marketing and PR. In years gone by, these were very different meanings.

Handily, these different functions could now merge and remove an anomoly. How could marketing exist tomorrow without web, new media and so forth?

Split some techies into the marketing function and you have tomorrows organisation. IMHO

Leave Comments

  
Security Image

Blog Search

Recent Posts

Art & Science of ...
State of Collaboration: Return ...
What Crimson Has Learned: ...
Using Analytics: Statistical program ...
Evaluation Factors: Identifying and ...

View by Author

Glenn Gow (79)
Rick Sklarin (11)
Allan Adler (7)
Dylan Charles (12)
Steven Lamont (26)
General (44)
Karen OBrien (41)
Judy Hopelain (1)

View by Categories

Interactive (107)
Products & Markets (102)
Channels & Partners (38)
Other Interesting Topics (5)
Lead Management (7)

Archives - Past 12 Months

July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009

Archives - By Year

2010
2009
2008
2007
2006