Blogroll    |    Favorite Sites    |    Books we Read    |    Visit crimson-consulting.com

The Dangers of “Could”
Posted by Steven Lamont on 03/17/09 under Channels & Partners, Products & Markets

uncertainty.jpgAs I continue to work with companies, discussion business plans and strategies, I have realized I have an aversion to the word “could”. I am hearing it more and more, especially as economic times get tougher and and more companies are rethinking their business strategy.
 
The problem is that I am hearing it at the point in the discussion when executives need to define their path forward. Strategy is all about making clear choices, then executing well on them. The strategy is the strategy until there is new information that require a change in direction and a new strategy.

There is no room for the word “could” in the definition of strategy. In fact, the use of the word signals to me a lack of strategy, a failure to make clear choices, because it leaves many pathways open for consideration. It is difficult for a company to execute effectively and efficiently on a strategy that has multiple pathways. Just because a product “could do this function” or a company “could go in this direction” does not mean it should.

With that said, there are still good applications for the use of “could” in the strategy process:

  • It is necessary to open up new options and possibilities in the brainstorming or idea phase. What could the company build? What go-to-market approaches could they follow? But once the brainstorming is done, it is time to close down the number of possibilities.
  • It is often helpful to consider what external events could happen over the next few years - in the areas of competitive moves, economy, customer tastes, or technology developments - to ensure the company has a response to these events. But each of these are external factors, rather than undecided choices for the company.
  • It is fine within limits to keep some options open for further down the road in the strategy. For example, it is fine to use “could” to define several exit options for the company 3-5 years down the road. Lots can happen in that time, and it is less necessary to nail down the specifics right up front. But watch out for applying this logic to choices in the next 6 months or a year, because every option left open has a cost in execution.

Listen to the discussions in your business planning sessions. Are you comfortable with how the word “could” is used? Or do you need to put a ban on the word to force some important choices about your direction?


Trackback

http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/wp-trackback.php?p=290
Subscribe to this topic Comment Rss or TrackBack
andreas.wpv said on March 23rd, 2009 - IP:76.203.242.80

Yes!
Define the strategy as good as possible and then stick to it. Modify regularly based on analytics.

No ‘could’ allowed, even for exit strategies, a strategy needs to be there. Based on position and outlook, better define a path to go, no thinking necessary. Fast and reliable.

Sometimes the hurdle is even lower… and planning next year’s campaign is mistaken to be a strategy.

Steve Lamont said on March 24th, 2009 - IP:98.207.0.234

Good comment Andreas!
I too hate how quickly and frequently companies redo their strategies. Any strategy created in a few hours on a white board and documented by Powerpoint, can be replaced by another strategy created with the same low level of rigor.
Hands off the strategy until conditions truly change!

Leave Comments

  
Security Image

Blog Search

Recent Posts

High-Value Engagement, Connecting with ...
Is Social Media Missing ...
Art & Science of ...
Art & Science of ...
State of Collaboration: Return ...

View by Author

Glenn Gow (80)
Rick Sklarin (12)
Allan Adler (7)
Dylan Charles (12)
Steven Lamont (26)
General (44)
Karen OBrien (42)
Judy Hopelain (1)

View by Categories

Interactive (109)
Products & Markets (103)
Channels & Partners (38)
Other Interesting Topics (5)
Lead Management (7)

Archives - Past 12 Months

August 2010
July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009

Archives - By Year

2010
2009
2008
2007
2006