Dec 212011

We are all mobileBy Judy Hopelain and Jim Lightsey

Jim and Judy recently led a panel discussion at the Silicon Valley chapter of the American Marketing Association on Mobile Marketing. Panelists included Beth Murphy, CMO of mobile-first site HotelTonight, Robyn Yoslow, Digital Strategist at Seagate Technologies, and Stephen Andrews, Director of Sales and Marketing at The Creative App Company. This article is based on preparation for and takeaways from that discussion.

Brand Managers have historically aimed for consistency in the online experience and have strived to deliver a largely uniform presentation of their brands. Their websites house most, if not all, of their content and serve as the one-stop-shop for accessing it. This approach to online brand management has been possible as long as users could access a brand’s online assets through just one platform, the laptop/desktop, and only a handful of operating systems.

Brands are in for a thrill — and brand management will be redefined — as Gartner forecasts that mobile will overtake the PC by 2013 as the main way users access the Internet. At the SVAMA panel discussion on mobile marketing, panelist Beth Murphy of HotelTonight shared with the audience that “Mobile users have different expectations of their experience than their computer-based counterparts: they want it to be tactile and much more engaging.” Meeting these expectations will require redesigning the brand’s mobile experience, not just porting the computer-based web experience over to mobile platforms.

Today, less than 30% of company websites are optimized for mobile access. Optimizing for mobile requires understanding each mobile platform’s unique advantages and constraints — from text messaging on mobile phones to wireless roaming and apps on smartphones and tablets. Google’s brand new gomo initiative is a reflection of the importance of optimizing for mobile, and the size of the opportunity. HTML 5 is also something to watch closely as an option to optimize the user experience across multiple devices and platforms.

Brand management will continue to evolve as brand teams are called on to define the brand experience for specific mobile platforms, and to develop mobile style guides that define the user interaction, depth of experience and local cultural requirements on each one. They will also need to specify how the brand’s messaging hierarchy and overall brand positioning are expressed through mobile. In the process, mobile affords opportunities for brand meaning that are different than that affording via traditional web channels. Thereby, mobile informs brand strategy and is also informed by it.

To make the initial mobile “case” to management, Brand Managers may want to run a few mobile promotions first so they have the numbers to justify the request.

Mobile is expanding what is possible within the user experiences and at the same time making brand management a lot more interesting and fun!

In my recent blog, originally published on Social Media B2B, I discussed how we work with many B2B clients who want to engage with their audience via social media. We often get the question about investment in LinkedIn vs. Facebook. You would think LinkedIn would be better for marketing to B2B customers. It’s designed for business. People use it only for business. They want you to use it for business. 120 million business people use it.

The only problem is that it’s not as good as Facebook for B2B marketing.

That doesn’t sound right, now does it?

After all, we know Facebook is for posting pictures of the kids’ soccer games, for saying happy birthday, for following consumer products, for keeping in touch with your friends. I mean, it’s aimed at consumers, isn’t it?

On the surface, yes. Below the surface, the business audience is there because consumers are business people too. Ultimately, the overriding reason to consider Facebook over LinkedIn is that business people spend more time on it. Please pay attention: they spend more time on it, so you – the B2B marketer – need to take advantage of that one overriding fact. It will help make you successful in social media.

So, tell me, how could Facebook be better for B2B social media marketing?

6 Ways That Facebook is Better Than LinkedIn

1. Facebook has created a development platform that makes it easier to create custom web pages. It’s really hard to do the same thing, with the same ease, with the same nicely designed results on LinkedIn.

2. All those business people are already on Facebook. They may not have joined with business in mind, but they are there. The majority of the 800+ million are involved in business.

3. You can find them. Just like on LinkedIn, you can customize your search to find the people you want to reach.

4. You can find their friends too. Facebook is much more effective than LinkedIn at exponential reach through friends of friends, and it is likely that your business audience is connected with their professional peers on Facebook.

5. You can protect them, if you need to. You can create closed, invitation only communities and protect the information about individuals within that community. We’ve done that for very security-sensitive executive users (CIOs and CTOs)! Here’s a link to the VMware CxO Corner on Facebook.

6. People spend more time on Facebook. It turns out that this last point is a big deal when comparing Facebook to LinkedIn.

People log onto LinkedIn for a few key reasons:

  • To update their resume
  • To post a job
  • To look for a job
  • To make a connection, often associated with posting or looking for a job

People go onto Facebook for many, many other reasons, and as a result, they go onto Facebook a lot more often, and spend a lot more time on it. Businesses that take advantage of business people who are spending time on Facebook will engage with those business users.

I have seen studies showing that business people spend more time on LinkedIn. Hmmm. The studies are flawed. They typically ask where do business people go today for business information. Well, if we B2B marketers aren’t using Facebook for business, then of course, they get their information today from LinkedIn. Duh. The results of these studies will change only when you change your approach.

While LinkedIn is not to be ignored (it has many good qualities), if you’re going to focus your efforts toward B2B audiences, invest more in Facebook. How have your results compared between Facebook and LinkedIn?

How to make sure your competitive analysis has real impact

All companies conduct competitive analysis. But in our work with clients, we too often see our clients engage in myopic self deception. So to get real, the first thing companies must do is remove their bias from their analysis, which can be like removing enamel from your teeth. Product management and product marketing own this puppy… so, let’s talk about some best practices that will help bring your efforts into clear focus.

It’s all about me! (Not!)

Eating, and even liking, your own dog food isn’t a bad thing as long as you have an objective palette for how the other cuisine tastes as well. Everybody wants to have a glowing competitive analysis in hand and be able to report to upper management that “yes, we really are the best.”  Your marketing department has gone to great lengths to show how your product line stacks up favorably against the competition.

However, potential customers won’t take your word for it – and they’ll get the real story. You need to get the real story and stay on top of what’s happening, whether you like what you hear or not (see “Compete Better, Use Your Competitors’ Products”).

Here are some tips for ensuring you discover your product’s true strengths and weaknesses so you can improve.

For Deep-dive Competitive Analyses:

  • Have practitioners interview practitioners: Seek out intelligent and experienced individuals who understand the real-life challenges your product is meant to solve. Since a deep-dive competitive analysis can yield results that may be unexpected, start by using the right type of personnel. Box-checkers will provide only superficial information.
  • Design the interviews to be wide-ranging and open ended, not structured: Surveys are best when they are open-ended and allow for a lively give-and-take between the interviewer and the subject. An open ended approach enables the interviewer to explore areas not previously considered.
  • Conduct lab-based testing: Labs enable the testers to see what’s really happening and to carefully evaluate your product relative to a competitor. Lab results often provide irrefutable insights to your product management and engineering teams.

For Competitive Landscape Assessments:

  • Don’t overlook emerging markets: Emerging markets can sneak up and leapfrog you if you’re not watching out for them, so ignore them at your peril. For example, in Africa, mobile payments (via cell phones) is taking off more than anywhere else in the world. Why? Because not only is there no wireline infrastructure for communication (hence, such transactions must be done via mobile), but there isn’t even a banking structure in Africa.
  • Include potential disruptors who can change the game: This is a big one and should make everyone nervous. Today’s age of rapid-fire development and innovation is the perfect breeding ground for disruptive technologies to come out of nowhere and change the market landscape virtually overnight. The iPad for example, changed the game for Netbooks, causing that once-decent market to go down in flames. VoIP has changed the game for telecom. Netflix blew away the DVD rental market. Such disruptors may be hard to spot way out in the distance, but be vigilant and keep your eyes on the horizon so you can be ready to act when one is approaching.

For Competitive Pricing Assessments:

  • Examine the “whole solution” pricing, not just the product pricing: Many things come into play here — tiered pricing, volume discounts, site licenses, bundles and so on — making it extremely difficult to do a meaningful comparison. And that’s without even talking about VAR programs and packages. Point products, at “cheaper” list price, can actually be the most expensive when the overall package is considered. Compare entire solutions.
  • Compare based on the customer’s perceptions of an equal solution, not your own: Focus on what the customer needs to meet their objectives. If your product is perceived as more expensive and at the same time is perceived as offering more than the customer needs, then a less capable, lower price product is a real threat. If, however, the customer values the complete solution you’ve created, then the lower price competitor may be (correctly) viewed as significantly less valuable.

For Competitive Channel Program Assessments:

  • What’s in a program? Determine what is used in the program, not what is designed into the program: If your program has features that never get used, then those features aren’t yet perceived as valuable by the channel. A competitor with a seemingly less robust program might be just what the channel needs.
  • Your channel partners’ other vendors are a competitor of sorts: Look at programs by companies that don’t compete with you but compete for your channel partners’ share of the wallet. Can you attract the best and brightest channel partners? Having better products and better prices alone won’t be enough. Find out who’s getting the lion’s share of your channel partners’ attention and take lessons from what they’re doing.

Keep your friends close, and your competition closer. By stepping aside and removing your own bias, what you can learn from them about yourself provides priceless ammunition for tackling the marketplace.

Cloud technologies are turning your channel partners into MSPs and the power will shift from you to them

Cloud computing changes partner relationshipsKaren (VP of Channel Marketing for one of our clients) and I were having a phone conversation the other day. She asked me how I thought the delivery of services via the cloud will impact her channel strategy. She said, “Some of our partners are really concerned that their business with us could go away if we’re successful with our cloud services approach.”

I responded that I used to think the cloud was bad for channel partners too. But our recent work has shown that that’s only true for some partners. Her real concern should be with her more sophisticated channel partners.  They are becoming Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to battle the very concern Karen raised, and when that happens, the game changes for her.

Riding on the Cloud, Many Channel Partners Are Morphing into Full-Fledged MSPs

Channel partners are looking at the changes cloud services are creating and the more sophisticated ones see an opportunity to become even more important in the value chain to the end customer. Rather than be cut out of the equation, they are adding services that make them indispensable to their end customers and diminish the value of any one particular technology vendor.

This is particularly true with SMBs or within verticals. As SMBs have gotten savvy to the cloud, they want their services on-demand, and to have them scale instantly to the needs of the moment, and perhaps most importantly, to not have to manage their IT function.  When channel partners decide to become MSPs, they create an overall offering (architecture) for the market they’re serving. When that happens, for technology vendors, your product is either IN or it’s OUT of that architecture.

Full MSP management will include everything customers touch (hardware, software and services). MSPs will limit the options they provide to customers…and that will mean only one option is selected (by the MSP), about which the customers have no real choice. SMB and many vertical end customers are willing to give up that choice in order to have someone manage everything for them.

That means the MSPs decide what hardware and software they’ll offer. As an example, think of security software on PCs. Up to now, an MSP’s 100 customers might have been able to choose from 3 or 4 security software options from different vendors. But the MSP will make this choice for the customer. They will make one selection for their architecture ….end of story. If you’re the provider of that security software, you can pop the cork and celebrate. If you’re not, you’re left out in the cold.

The successful MSP will grow to serve many, many customers. For those end customers, the technology vendor no longer influences their decisions. Only the MSP will.

Pay Attention to the New Power Player

I told Karen that we are actually watching some vendors ignore this trend. And that by ignoring it, not only are they wasting tremendous dollars in marketing to people who won’t make the decision (end customers), but they’re going to lose the architectural sale to the MSPs.

Karen is smart to be paying attention to these observations. That will give her the chance she needs to change the nature of her channel partner relationships.

She shared with me too that she was already thinking about this at the product level. “Certain aspects of our product line need to change to accommodate this shifting dynamic. We need to start looking at things through the MSP’s eyes, not just our end customers.” She’s exactly right…and forewarned is forearmed.

For others, though, who ignore this disruption, they may find that before they’ve even considered a new battle plan, they’ve lost the war.

Many B2B professionals are still skeptical

Janet, a senior exec at one of our B2B clients, recently said to me, “Social media just doesn’t feel like an important area of investment for us. We’re not selling to consumers, we’re selling to hardcore business people. I think we’d be wasting our time and money.”

I couldn’t blame her for being skeptical. While no one can deny the explosive popularity of social media, for B2B, some hard core justifications are still AWOL. Businesses of all sizes are executing Twitter campaigns, creating business Facebook pages, producing corporate blogs and YouTube videos in the hopes of going viral. Those things can work when targeting consumers, but do they work when targeting other businesses? The jury’s still out, but B2B companies are nonetheless rushing to jump on the social media bandwagon for fear of being left in the dust in an environment full of constant paradigm shifts that move at lightning speed.

But the concerns Janet expressed are real.

  • “Show me the metrics!” Unless you have a windfall success story, like Avaya’s quarter million $ deal, which came in large part thanks to Twitter, there aren’t a lot of solid B2B examples to site yet, particularly when compared to the plethora of B2C successes.
  • “Show me the money!” Executives understandably want to see solid links between investments in marketing programs and real revenue. Tracking makes it easy see the number of friends, followers, connections, and comments one is getting, but how does that translate to the bottom line? Does a popular blog result in any measurable dollars? Maybe not. Finding these links can be a nebulous, if not impossible, venture. For some, that’s a deal breaker.
  • “Show me the point!” Janet commented on wasting time. Social media takes time, and lots of it…it’s no small task in time or expense to establish a professional presence in social media. It’s also not something you should start and stop. It’s a commitment to an effort where you may not see much ROI for quite awhile. But half-hearted attempts don’t impress and can actually do harm, so if you’re not up for the long swim, don’t dip your toe in the water.

So why are B2Bs increasing their investments?
If all the above sounds pretty dismal, why are 86% of B2B companies investing in some form of social media, compared to only 82% of B2C (see report)? For starters, consider that social media isn’t the first time a technology initially targeted for personal use has transformed into a major business tool. Think instant messaging, smart phones and smartphone apps, which were originally designed for personal use and fun — and were frowned on by the business world. It’s hard not to see a similar trend with Social Media.

I shared these thoughts with Janet for her to consider.

  • Integration vs. ad hoc postings: Janet’s company may already have a social presence, whether she knows (or likes) it or not. Many employees regularly create haphazard and ad hoc postings about their company…not only LinkedIn, but also Facebook, Blogs, Twitter, and YouTube. Such uncontrolled, disparate postings can be a disadvantage and work at cross purposes to an integrated marketing plan. Far better to own your social media presence so it portrays a cohesive presence.
  • Janet’s B2B audience is there: Even though Janet’s target is business people, statistics are increasingly showing that professional buyers consult social media sources during the buying process and before making a decision. A recent eMarketer study reveals over 90% of B2B buyers use social media to research purchases and are heavily influenced by third-party feedback in their purchasing decisions – both to identify solutions and to limit risk.
    The directive to “be where your audience is” has never been more relevant or more possible than in today’s integrated web world where marketers can know precisely who and where there audience is. “Being there” has also gone beyond a direct dollars-and-cents relationship—a presence in social media has simply come to be expected.Businesses that aren’t there are creating a negative perception of themselves as being behind the times or unavailable to their clientele.
  • The multiplier effect is hard to argue with: Best practices already exist for leveraging social media as part of an integrated marketing plan. No marketing element should be done in a vacuum, and from tradeshows to ad campaigns to thought leadership webinars, integration and expansion are the keys for a successful marketing impact. When used as a follow-on tool for another campaign, social media channels provide an excellent venue for broadening the impact of other marketing strategies and investments. And while not everything goes viral the way we might like, with a Tweet here, a Facebook posting there, you can dramatically increase your reach.
  • Don’t get trumped by your competition: Rising success stories – check out how an EMC campaign used nearly every promotional channel — are validating the concern that B2B social media skeptics – and their businesses — will be left gasping in their competitor’s exhaust. The hard reality is that ROI metrics are imprecise and it’s always been difficult for marketing to link its efforts directly with revenue. Perhaps the question is why should B2B social media be any different? (See this slideshare/webinar on generating ROI from social media.)
    While social media may still be an unproven concept that delivers results difficult to quantify, it’s moving forward so quickly that there’s real risk in staying out of the game. Yes, there is risk involved in allocating money to a B2B social media campaign….but as marketers, we’re used to risk….and there is even greater risk in not doing so.

I confirmed with Janet that for her, there is indeed a leap of faith involved in B2B social media. But the question today is not whether you can afford to implement a B2B social media presence into your marketing campaigns—it’s whether you can afford not to.

crimson_global_cloud.jpgHow geographic differences are significant to product planning, marketing and sales
 
I recently sat down with Raghu, VP of Product Management and Marketing for Cloud Solutions, at one of our clients. We discussed some problems he is having gaining widespread acceptance of his solution.
 
“I get a lot of feedback from our field and partners on what’s working and what’s not working, and yet, it’s more confusing than helpful. The feedback is quite different, depending on where they are. It’s hard to make sense of it all,” Raghu said.

I see this issue in many of our clients. Whether your product management / product marketing teams are in the US, Japan, Europe or elsewhere, they bring with them an understandable bias to their home market. Many companies fail to consider – or are simply stumped by – the different requirements other regions have. This oversight significantly impedes the expansion of products internationally and reduces global sales opportunities. What can companies do to incorporate geographic differences?

This issue is particularly acute with the emerging field of cloud solutions. Let’s look at some of the regional differences that are driving Raghu crazy:

  • Europe: Privacy is always an area of concern (see “Security Is Imperative for Cloud Computing”). In particular, areas of Europe (think Switzerland, and the EU) have particularly strict data privacy laws. These regions are far more likely to adopt private cloud solutions verses public in the near-term. Something to watch for is, should the EU decide to leverage a pan-EU data security platform, this could create more demand across Europe, with the more conservative countries following after the early adopters test out solutions.
  • Japan: The Japanese market is heavily dependent on outsourcers, which are currently slow to adopt cloud offerings. However, once they develop proven cloud offerings, adoption of cloud solutions should accelerate rapidly due to the comfort and dependency on outsourcers.
  • Asia: In China, government regulations greatly reduce the potential for public cloud solutions. Piracy also plays a role in reducing demand for any product that isn’t free, so the cloud solution should not attempt to compete with free options. In addition, most Chinese companies prefer on-premise solutions. Singapore, South Korea, Thailand and Malaysia appear to be aggressively planning hybrid cloud adoption strategies.
  • Developing regions: In most developing countries, one would think their lack of legacy investments would make it easier for them to adopt cloud. However, the lack of a strong partner ecosystem is a deterrent to more rapid adoption.

Vive la différence
So, the question Raghu asked me is – “What do I do with all of these differences”? I said to Raghu that the first step is to not get overwhelmed with data, but instead, to start performing some simple research and develop a prioritized global marketing plan.

  • Research: The first step is to conduct some research on market segmentation. Educate your team on the different approaches regional markets have to implementing cloud technology — how they will use it, how they will understand it and how they will purchase it. Once you’ve done your homework, prioritize the information based on what your research has identified as the most important market segments for you. From your list, what can you add to your MRD list now, and what can be targeted for a later date?
  • Adaptable value propositions: The second step is to create a global value propositions that represents your overarching solution benefits that fit everywhere. What makes your product unique and differentiated to customers globally? There are some value props that are indeed universal, and your marketing messages should naturally include those universal values.
     
    Once your global positioning is done, you can step into segment-specific and/or geographic-specific positioning. Now that you know what’s important to your most important segments, provide them with the value propositions that resonate specifically with them. Do this not just from a sales perspective, but with you local marketing as well.
  • Partner relationships: The third step is to consider the “whole solution” which includes your partners. Don’t think you have to build the whole thing for each and every market you want a presence in. That’s what Partners bring to the table. They can educate both users and developers, and help build a strong partner ecosystem.
     
    In fact, partners can assist you with all three of these steps – with education, helping to prioritize regional value propositions, and establishing a partner-based relationship in specific regions. Partner programs that make use of regional VARs and system integrators will be very useful in any cloud marketing strategy. They will have a closer connection to the regional audience, and a better understanding of how they do business, which makes them a great liaison between you the provider of cloud technology, and the global consumers of it. (For more, see Channel Program Modeling.)

Raghu agreed that these steps would help him not only define and build better solutions, but will also enable him to position his cloud solution more effectively in all of his key markets.

  1. Suit up, shake hands, and deliver a speech about the technical superiority of your product.
  2. Trot out your recent press releases about the latest upgrades and newest features.
  3. Try to sound like these data points provide the quintessential business solution.

Does it work? No.

marketing-fail-or-success.jpegI recently met with Paul, VP of Solutions Marketing for a technology company. He told me they weren’t landing deals they had thought would be sure bets. I asked him a few probing questions and as he told me the story, I quickly recognized the trap they had fallen into. His company was misunderstanding what “solutions marketing” is in three fundamental ways, and as a result, their marketing approach was off target. Here’s how:

  1. The Wrong Audience: A solution is defined in the eyes of the customer, who is very often not a technologist. They weren’t talking to the person who will benefit from their solution, they were talking about a solution to the same technical audience they’ve always spoken with.
  2. The Wrong Focus: They were repeating the chorus “my product rocks,” which is the wrong song to sing. The focus wasn’t on the worries that keep the Business Decision Maker (BDM) up at night. Since they didn’t know the reasons for their customer’s insomnia, they were off track from the start.
  3. The Wrong Message: Their real value prop was so hidden that even the best GPS system couldn’t find it. Touting technical merits may excite the IT staff, but the BDM doesn’t give a hoot. Their usual tactic was to leap-frog over the competition on technical issues…which then leads to bidding wars over product features and options.

Paul and I discussed how to remedy the situation as follows:

  1. The Right Audience: Make sure you know who the technology and IT gurus are because you’ll need to know later. But the #1 priority is finding the BDMs and influencers, and connecting with them first. Determine who the customer is for your solution – and focus there.
  2. The Right Focus: Know what the BDM’s critical issues are before you even speak with them. Perform research and interviews so you know your target customer’s care-abouts, concerns and issues almost as well as they do.
  3. The Right Message: Focus on business-level solutions instead of technology. Saying “This product is twice as fast as the competition,” invites the next five competitors to prove why their particular features are more important. Say instead, “This solution will help you get your job done better—and here’s how…,” and then excite them with the ways your solution makes this true.

In summary, examine your current value props and dump them if they’re off base. Transform them into meaningful marketing solutions. Paul took this advice, led his team to recraft their marketing message and directed it to the right people. They then started experiencing more closed deals and better, longer lasting relationships with their customers.

youtubeb2b.jpgWe help many companies with marketing and social media strategy. More and more, the topic of YouTube is coming up and people are asking why they should invest in a YouTube channel.
 
They express many concerns:

  • What’s the ROI?
  • Isn’t it for consumers and not B2B?
  • We see the value of video, but why YouTube specifically?

Most people agree that video is becoming important to B2B. For example:

  • Video can engage your audience better than other media
  • Studies show decision-makers want to watch, not read
  • Studies also show that people who have seen a video are more likely to convert to a lead

So, why a YouTube channel if you have videos on your website?

  1. Your videos get discovered more easily. People look for videos on YouTube (10 to 1 over any other channel) and they will more likely find videos on your topic when looking on YouTube than randomly searching.
  2. Your company’s messages get discovered more easily. Especially when integrating with other social media channels, YouTube improves your SEO and natural search.
  3. Your videos get shared more. YouTube is optimized for sharing and sending information to other people. It’s viral in a better and more effective way than via videos on your website.
  4. It’s more convenient for you and users. YouTube and tool vendors are making it much easier for a user to have a great experience (and find what they want when they want it) via the YouTube infrastructure. Your website isn’t optimized for video.

Here is one example of a great B2B YouTube Channel.

I’d love to hear from you about what’s working (how you audit it) and what’s not working for you in your approach to social media and especially YouTube. Let me know!

sm_audit.jpgWhat is a social media audit and why should you implement – on at least an annual basis? A social media audit is an examination of multiple factors of a social media marketing strategy implementation. The goal of the audit is to look inside and out to see if you can make adjustments and improvements in the effort to optimize your results. Audits help you reset priorities, measure results and chart your future course – and see social media through the lens of your audience.

I am often asked what the difference is between monitoring and an audit. Social media monitoring is about listening on a daily basis to what your audiences are talking about so you can respond real time. It’s basically showing up at the right time and right place. An audit is an in-depth process that would happen at least once a year to refine your strategy and implementation.

Experienced in social media marketing? If you are an experienced social media marketer and you would like to take your program to the next level, an audit will help to steer you in the right direction.

New to social media marketing? If you are new to social media marketing an audit will give you feedback on what your competitors are doing and how your customers are engaging in social media.

A social media audit helps you address these questions:

  1. How can our social media implementation provide a competitive advantage?
  2. Where should we focus our attention – or what will give us the best return?
  3. What’s the most effective way to engage with partners and customers?
  4. What’s the right metric to track, what’s the ROI?
  5. Who should be executing social media in our company?
  6. Can I get outside help to scale?

We’re providing a high level complimentary audit to prove the value of this approach. You can get an overview of what is included in an initial social media audit here. An audit will help you optimize your efforts and get more from your social media strategy and implementation because it will be implemented with your company objectives in mind. In addition, we bring in best practices and benchmarks on the type of results you can expect.

Crimson has been doing social media marketing for leading technology firms such as Microsoft, IBM, Cisco and others for over 4 years. We have a defined a repeatable approach and framework for social media marketing initiatives.

Our clients who are deeply engaged in social media marketing have found an annual audit provides the quantifiable and qualitative feedback that provides the rationalization for next year’s plans.

What do you think about the idea of an annual social media marketing audit? Please feel free to contact me to discuss or to set up your audit.

Interested in how to connect successfully with CIOs online? Then please vote for and attend our proposed panel at South by Southwest (SXSW).

We’re putting together an interesting panel for SXSW this year and we’re really excited about it! I will be moderating this panel of marketing experts who all engage with the CIO, who are one of the most difficult to reach and highly sought-after audiences in enterprise marketing. This will be a rare opportunity to hear from some leading marketers with Microsoft and Cisco (and more) about how they interact effectively with the CIO audience through exclusive communities, digital marketing, social media and events.

The topics discussed will include:

  • How to best engage with the CIO customer?
  • How are CIO’s engaging online? Are there any special considerations with this audience?
  •  What channels are most successful? EG: Community, social media, online events? For more insights on trends in social media, see The Social Web, Taking it Personally
  • What are some examples/ case studies of how leading brands are engaging with the CIO?
  • How do you measure success with a high-value, smaller audience?

Vote for us and let us know what topics you would like to see discussed. Voting closes end of day August 27th.

© 2011 Achieve Market Leadership Contact us: info@crimson-consulting.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha