Blogroll    |    Favorite Sites    |    Books we Read    |    Visit crimson-consulting.com
Posts about  Lead Management
Evaluation Factors: Identifying and weighting factors for your channel program
Posted by Dylan Charles on 04/23/10

istock_000003459153xsmall.jpgA channel program analysis will be tailored to each specific program. One cannot assume that program elements are interchangeable between business sectors, companies, or even the individual brands within a single company. Quite often the lessons learned in one program are confidently applied to another and fail miserably. Your channel program will blend a unique combination of brand, technology, business plans and other channel program elements.

The evaluation will use the same analytical tools you employ with many other areas of marketing. An analytical process such as conjoint or logit modeling demands precision in defining program categories and prioritizing each element. One requirement is to objectively quantify elements in order to avoid emotional judgments in the evaluation. Avoid skewing the analysis with negative reactions by channel partners who tend to voice frustrations on what cost them the last sale. callout_blog2.png

The table below provides examples of elements you may identify in a channel program. The examples show ways to group the elements and weightings for analytical modeling. Specific elements in your evaluation will vary based on requirements of the particular channel program.

Program Categories High-Priority Program Features Low-Priority Program Features
Marketing
Resources
  • Marketing tools
  • Marketing planning
  • Marketing Development
    Funds (MDFs)
  • Marketing training
  • Partner conferences
  • Sales Resources
  • Field sales engagement/
    lead sharing
  • Sales coverage/rules
    of engagement
  • Relationship management
  • Sales tools
  • Sales planning
  • Sales training
  • Technical Resources
  • Technical tools
  • Technical planning
  • Technical support
  • Technology/product
    integration and alignment
  • Product certification
  • Technical training
  • Professional/technical
    certifications
  • Infrastructure  
  • Partner portal, directories,
    partner networks, partner
    relationship management
  • Rewards and Incentives  
  • In-house use products, proof-of-concept
    funding, OEM and resale
    discounts/rebates, influence/
    referral fees, non-financial
    recognition (non-cash awards)
  •  
    What factors do you use to objectively evaluate your programs?

    Permalink Bookmark This Comments(0) TrackBack

    Predicting Payoff of Channel Programs
    Posted by Dylan Charles on 04/07/10

    istock_000001619627xsmall.jpgHow do you measure the success of stimulus spending? It’s an obvious question for the Government, and it’s one that channel marketing professionals should also pose when it comes to money spent for demand generation. The ugly truth is this – money you spend to boost channel sales often disappears into a black hole. Sadly, your campaign can spend millions of dollars and tie up scarce resources with no viable return. Unfortunately, instead of boosting sales, it reaps just a meager blip. If managed effectively, these programs should bring stories of success. Instead, channel partners congregate to heap undesirable blame on you for hampering their success with “sub-par” support. To make matters worse, your CFO blames you for nuking the budget.

    Before you spend a dime, you need to counter these risks with better modeling of channel program options. In coming weeks, we’ll take an in-depth look at how you can optimize your channel o¬ffering and enjoy more accuracy in predicting program revenue. The goal is to know, in advance, how a change in discounts, MDF funds, contracts or other elements will impact competitive challenges and return on investment. For more information on how to align your channels, check out Crimson’s channel articles in the Insight section of their website at http://www.crimson-consulting.com/insight.html.

    As we explore this subject, let us know how your channel programs are underperforming or outperforming.

    Permalink Bookmark This Comments(1) TrackBack

    Sales & Channel Lead Integration - Enabling cross-channel selling with integrated lead management
    Posted by Dylan Charles on 03/25/10

    istock_000009263681xsmall.jpgLead management systems delivered as a SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) solution have revolutionized Sales and Channel communication. Their capabilities provide enormous benefits for cross-channel selling. With these systems in place, there is now every reason to provide your channel partners with access to the automated lead or deal registration process used by your internal sales representatives. To achieve this capability, be sure to use the best practice of setting up a repeatable and selective process for interacting with your direct sales reps, channel partners, on-line or retail channels.

    F500 companies often have multiple platforms to manage sales and channel opportunities. Integrating marketing campaigns and lead qualification into these sales systems provides the sales rep with a prospect’s relevant history of interest and contact with your company.

    New automated Lead Management systems now facilitate the means of driving growth in incremental revenue—without attaching significant cost. A particular benefit is accurate measurement of marketing ROI on each campaign. Additional benefits, specifically for marketing include:

    • Best leads to go to appropriate sales channels
    • More sales coverage through engaged partners

    On the sales side, additional benefits include:

    • More efficient use of selling time
    • More prospects who are ready to buy

    For a great synopsis of lead management best practices, take a look at the Crimson white paper “Tuning Lead Management for More Profit”.

    What’s working and what needs fine-tuning in your own lead management practices?

    Permalink Bookmark This Comments(0) TrackBack

    Lead Qualification - Qualifying campaign leads before you pass them to sales
    Posted by Dylan Charles on 03/15/10

    istock_000002477861xsmall.jpgIt seems so obvious. Sales people want qualified leads. They want prospects that are already looking for the solution being sold, and are pre-disposed to accept a sales call. Success in lead management includes the pillar of Lead Qualification—the process of consistently providing lead pools with a large percentage of pre-disposed buyers. Putting truly qualified prospects into the lead pool motivates sales professionals and improves the odds of more sales.

    Qualification Thresholds: A useful strategy for success is evaluating the qualification thresholds for each campaign in relation to engagement activities. You automatically track activities such as web page hits, video views, collateral downloads, and software trials. Be sure to listen for patterns in feedback from the sales team or channel partners. Consistent complaints about non-qualified leads on a particular campaign might justify fine-tuning the thresholds. Scoring allows you to empirically judge the quality of leads previously designated as “qualified.” Data from a scoring system enables rational adjustment of controls, and helps to minimize passage of unqualified leads to sales.

    Multi-Tiered Lead Qualification: In a large, global organization, using an automated, multi-tiered lead qualification process will provide more granular control and accuracy. For example, one of the world’s largest computer manufacturers faced declining revenue from an old channel business. Its goal was to significantly grow enterprise revenue without hiring (expensive) direct outside sales reps. The company created a new program targeting end users that directly used channel partners for fulfillment. A closed-loop lead generation system segmented prospects in an existing database. Results were more than 6,000 qualified leads resulting in $15 million in incremental sales during the first two quarters. ROI was 1,250% with $60 million of incremental pipeline sales (for more info, please view the Success Story on the Crimson Consulting website).

    Building a multi-tiered process like this one entails the use of technologies to automate the nurturing of leads, along with a team that can help exploit lead management data. These capabilities initiate a growing relationship with a prospect before it goes to sales. With truly qualified prospects, sales professionals can spend their time responding to people who are ready to engage.

    What techniques do you use to ensure your leads are well-qualified?

    Permalink Bookmark This Comments(1) TrackBack

    Lead Profiling - Preparing your contact database for campaign segmentation
    Posted by Dylan Charles on 03/03/10

    istock_000003141726xsmall.jpgAs we continue looking at best practices in lead generation campaigns, it is important to understand how to segment your leads for campaign success. Developing a strategy and a process that prepares the database for easy campaign segmentation will simplify and streamline campaign list building. Assigning accurate profile data will enable your campaign to use relevant messages and influence and ultimately win prospects faster and easier.

    Some ways that Crimson has helped our clients ensure their leads are well-segmented include:

    Adding a self-qualification requirement to a web-to-lead form.
    This can provide instant value in profiling any potential candidates for a quick, short-term marketing campaign. As part of your data mart for Lead Management, profiling will also serve as a basis for future campaigns.

    Look for ways to accelerate profiling new prospects.
    Fresh data is better for matching prospects to the right campaign. Inaccuracies or changing customer circumstances make these data worth less over time.

    A big challenge is that leads come from diverse sources: web inquiries, purchased lists, sales contacts, partner contacts, and customers. Unfortunately, these are often scattered across the globe in various Customer Relationship Management and other database systems. Such data become relatively insignificant and dramatically decline in value if you cannot tap them immediately for an urgent campaign that presents itself.

    We’ve all heard of implementations that were too slow and became useless. For example, one company expended three years to build a marketing data warehouse. As a result, they never used it for a single campaign because the data was so outdated!

    In some cases, you may need specialized assistance in order to consolidate and cleanse prospects and customer databases within multiple sources. Investing the time and energy to develop new processes to keep data fresh and profiles accurate may seem counter-intuitive to the sense of urgency around touching your contacts quickly. However, these steps will ensure your long-term lead management practices are repeatable, targeted and productive.

    How does your company ensure your leads are profiled quickly and accurately?

    Permalink Bookmark This Comments(0) TrackBack

    Lead Management Matters!
    Posted by Dylan Charles on 02/18/10

    istock_000004057014xsmall.jpgAt Crimson, we have recently added a lead management practice, designed to help our clients with their prospect management challenges. Demand generation is the deliverable produced by marketing that connects ready and willing buyers with a sales team. Improving demand generation entails a chain of processes laced with marketing lingo like respondents, lead profiles, bounce rates, open rates, and conversions. These universal terms, commonly utilized by marketing professionals, don’t signify the end of a campaign. Rather, the bottom line is only one thing matters: placing qualified buyers in the call queues of every sales person within the organization.

    Some key factors that we believe help increase the effectiveness of demand generation include:

    • Lead Management Process Development: Successful marketing organizations control the processes of demand generation with Lead Management. The tactic we use at Crimson to implement Lead Management is usually a closed-loop approach that meticulously tracks campaigns and marketing programs from the point of launch to the point of revenue using online tools and analytics.
    • Automation: We have found that automation of common tasks and analysis processes gives our clients reliable access to immediate, real-time data which chronicles the success of each program. It also allows clients to quickly test a new concept, measure it, and evaluate any form of progress that ensues.

    Continually tuning lead management practices on a timely basis can result in dramatic improvements to demand generation. In the coming weeks, we will be sharing additional “best practices” for enhancing lead management and demand generation.

    Does your organization follow a lead management process that tracks the entire life of a lead?

    Permalink Bookmark This Comments(2) TrackBack

    What do Marketing Systems and Steroids have in Common?
    Posted by Glenn Gow on 02/03/10

    istock_8093474xsmall_muscle.pngProperly used, you get bigger and stronger.
     
    Most likely your marketing and sales organizations are using a combination of SaaS and software applications that promise to meet your objective of bigger and better demand generation.
     
    Never before has marketing and sales been presented with such an array of productivity-enhancing opportunities. The side effect of all of this capability is that we are often unprepared to tap into the potential of our marketing systems. We get locked into a few features here and there. Whether due to lack of vision, lack of manpower, or lack of training, the result is a weak and lackluster program. Many begin to question the overall effectiveness of their marketing systems, wondering: Are they generating the ROI that is expected or desired? How many of these types of systems are in use and are they effectively working together to meet objectives?

    So how do you get the most out of your current systems when you may be using a combination of marketing systems, including:

    • Social media monitoring tools (e.g. Radian6, Visible Technologies)
    • Website analytics (e.g. Omniture, Coremetrics)
    • CRM/SFA (e.g. Salesforce, Siebel)
    • Marketing automation (e.g. Eloqua, Marketo)
    • Social CRM (e.g. Lithium, Helpstream)
    • Enterprise Marketing Management (e.g. Aprimo, Unica)
    • Partner Portals (usually built internally)
    • Other

    By analyzing the number of systems and their interconnection, we often find a variety of challenges that allow us to identify opportunities for improvement:

    • Issues of properly set expectations and objectives - Do you really know what you want to do and are you able to measure it using your systems?
    • Ownership of results - Who really needs the info and are they getting it?
    • Right people in place to implement - Is your staffing at an adequate level to truly make the systems shine?
    • Training - Are the people administrating the systems expert in their implementation?

    What is the next step? Pull a team together with the purpose of identifying these opportunities. Call in a few experts who can identify the points of integration. Evaluate your campaigns and how well the systems have handled each phase.

    Evaluating the systems in use and providing insight, strategy, and execution to tap into the best of what you have will provide you with the shot you needed to improve your demand generation results.

    Permalink Bookmark This Comments(0) TrackBack

    Blog Search

    Recent Posts

    Old Spice Guy Knows ...
    High-Value Engagement, Connecting with ...
    Is Social Media Missing ...
    Art & Science of ...
    Art & Science of ...

    View by Author

    Glenn Gow (80)
    Rick Sklarin (12)
    Allan Adler (7)
    Dylan Charles (12)
    Steven Lamont (26)
    General (44)
    Karen OBrien (43)
    Judy Hopelain (1)

    View by Categories

    Interactive (110)
    Products & Markets (103)
    Channels & Partners (38)
    Other Interesting Topics (5)
    Lead Management (7)

    Archives - Past 12 Months

    August 2010
    July 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009

    Archives - By Year

    2010
    2009
    2008
    2007
    2006